Arrangement of details and ideas is confusing
Confusing position on the direction the government should proceed
| Arrangement of details and ideas is unclear
Unclear position on the direction the government should proceed
| Details and ideas are generally arranged in order
Clearly stated position on the direction the government should proceed
Most details support the concluding solutions and recommendations
| Details and ideas are orderly arranged and easy to follow
Clearly stated position on the direction the government should proceed
All details support the concluding solutions and recommendations
|
Students do not use a multimedia presentation for the group proposal | Students use a multimedia presentation/web page for the group proposal, but design elements interfere with communication
Little creativity in presenting the proposal
| Students use a multimedia presentation/web page for the group proposal and design elements are appropriate for communication
Students creatively present their recommendation
| Students use a multimedia presentation/web page for the group proposal and design elements enhance and support communication
Students creatively present their recommendation
|
Proposal does not address energy use, societal needs and/or environmental concerns
Chemical evidence is not presented to support the choice
Consequences of this issue are absent
Solutions and/or recommendations are absent or confusing
References are not included
| Proposal to address energy use, societal needs and/or environmental concerns is vague, confusing
Chemical evidence is not presented to support the proposal
Consequences of this issue are vague, confusing
Solutions and/or recommendations are absent or inappropriate
References are not included
| Proposal addresses the different types of energy use, societal needs and/or environmental concerns
Little chemical evidence is presented to support the choice
At least one consequence of this issue is presented
One general solution and/or recommendation is presented
References are included to cite supporting evidence
| Proposal incorporates the different possible types of energy use, societal needs and environmental concerns
Chemical evidence is presented to support the proposal
Short and long term implications of this issue are presented
One general solution and/or recommendation is presented
References are included to cite supporting evidence
|
Presentation is disorganized and does not offer additional information.
Limited knowledge of energy alternatives and their effects.
Recommendation implies minimal understanding of the issue.
| Presentation is disorganized and does not offer additional information.
Knowledge of energy alternatives and their effects.
Recommendation is discussed, but is not a practical solution.
| Presentation is professional, organized and informative, but does not offer additional content.
Demonstrated knowledge of energy alternatives and their effects.
Recommendation is practical and clearly discussed.
| Presentation is professional, organized and informative offering more content than can be seen on the page.
Extensive knowledge of energy alternatives and their effects is evident.
Recommendation is thoroughly thought out and clearly discussed.
|
Web page is disorganized and design elements interfere with the information being presented.
Spelling and grammar are inadequate.
| Web page is organized, but some elements interfere with the information being presented.
Spelling and grammar are inadequate.
| Web page is organized and attractive, but some design elements detract from the information being presented.
Spelling , grammar and layout are considered.
| Web page is clearly organized, attractive, and elements add to the mearning of the information.
Spelling, grammar and layout are clearly considered.
|
| | | |