The student recognized patterns and relationships. | The student recognized some patterns and relationships. | The student recognized important patterns and relationships in the problem. | The student created a general rule or formula for solving related problems. |
The student used a model or representation that was insufficient or inaccurate. | The used a model or representation to explore the relationships in the problems. | The student used a variety of models or representations to explore relationships in the problem. | The student used a model or representation that helped to clarify and extend the problem?s meaning. |
The student's strategies were not appropriate for the problem.
The student didn't seem to know where to begin. | The student used an oversimplified approach to the problem.
The student offered little or no explanation of the strategies used. | The student chose appropriate, efficient strategies for solving the problem.
The student justified each step of their work. | The student chose innovative and insightful strategies for solving the problem.
The student proved that their solution was correct and that their approach was valid. |
The student's reasoning did not support the student?s work. | The student sometimes made leaps in their logic that were hard to follow. | The logic of the student's solution was apparent. | The student provided examples and/or counter examples to support their solution. |
The student made errors in computation serious enough to flaw the solution.
The student gave no evidence of how they arrived at their answer. | The student made minor computational errors.
The student gave evidence for their solution that was inconsistent or unclear. | The student's computations were essentially accurate.
The student gave evidence for their solution that clearly supported their solution. | All aspects of the student's solution were completely accurate.
The student showed multiple ways to compute their answer. |
The student worked with an identified technological application to analyze a pattern using a limited number of representations. | The student worked with an identified technological application to analyze, and generalize a pattern using a limited number of representations. | The student selected appropriate technological applications to analyze, and generalize a variety of patterns using tables, diagrams, graphs, words, and, when possible, symbolic rules. | The student selected a variety of appropriate technological applications to analyze, and generalize a variety of patterns using tables, diagrams, graphs, words, and, when possible, symbolic rules. |
The student's explanation rambled without a clear focus. | The student's explanation was redundant or hard to follow in places. | The student's explanation was well organized, flowed logically and was easy to follow. | The student's explanation was clear, concise providing an in depth explanation of their reasoning. |
The student found no connections to other disciplines or mathematical concepts. | The student's solution hinted at a connection to an application or another area of mathematics. | The student connected their solution process to other problems, areas of mathematics or applications. | The student related the underlying structure of the problem to other similar problems. |